|
Dear Steve,
I thank you very much for your precious advice!
I have been quite busy this week, but I have just sent an e-mail to Mr. Barth and Ms. Näsholm. I'll keep you informed of what happens...
I didn't know that Hal Arkowitz was such a precursor and that he even supervised Bill Miller! Thus I think it's really worth that I send him another e-mail...as I still haven't gotten any news from him. It is the same for Ms. Fortini, who must be, as you noted, very busy right now. Time will tell!
I contacted two other Professors (Henny Westra, David Hodgins) and I'm about to send an e-mail to Teresa Moyers, whose work on the "active ingredients" of MI are really interesting for someone like me!
I realized that the main problem for me, as a psychologist, to learn MI and then to develop it and have it admitted as an effective "method" for the treatment of psychological problems, is that MI is still mostly seen as "a technique only useful for addicted people". Very few psychologists in Switzerland are really involved in the dissemination of MI and its applications for a wide range of psychological problems. Indeed there are much more physicians practicing MI than psychologists and their use of MI is almost exclusively focused on substance misuse issues.
My "MI-quest" is far from being over... But is beginning quite well, thanks to your advice and your workshop, which I am looking forward to attending this October!
More news soon!!
PS: I apoligized because I involuntarily posted my last message twice, and as I couldn't delete it, then I changed the text of the second one so that it doesn't appear one more time.
|